<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><channel rdf:about="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/?rss=yes"><title>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America</title><description>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America RSS feed: Current Issue.    
 Neurosurgery Clinics of North America  updates you on the latest surgical techniques for patients with spine, brain, and 
central nervous system conditions; keeps you up to date on the newest advances; and provides a sound basis for choosing treatment options. Each issue focuses on a single topic in neurosurgery and is presented under the direction of a guest editor who is in the forefront of 
clinical practice and research.


   </description><link>http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/?rss=yes</link><dc:publisher>Elsevier Inc.</dc:publisher><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:rights> © 2012 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </dc:rights><prism:publicationName>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America</prism:publicationName><prism:issn>1042-3680</prism:issn><prism:volume>23</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:publicationDate>April 2012</prism:publicationDate><prism:copyright> © 2012 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </prism:copyright><prism:rightsAgent>healthpermissions@elsevier.com</prism:rightsAgent><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS104236801200023X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000241/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000253/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000174/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000186/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000113/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000162/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000149/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000101/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000125/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000022/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000046/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000071/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000034/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000058/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS104236801200006X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000083/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000095/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000150/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000137/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000265/abstract?rss=yes"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS104236801200023X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Contributors</title><link>http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS104236801200023X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>Contributors</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S1042-3680(12)00023-X</dc:identifier><dc:source>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 23, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-04-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>23</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1042-3680(11)X0006-2</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>iii</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>v</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000241/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Contents</title><link>http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000241/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>Contents</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S1042-3680(12)00024-1</dc:identifier><dc:source>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 23, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-04-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>23</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1042-3680(11)X0006-2</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>vii</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>x</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000253/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Forthcoming Issues</title><link>http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000253/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>Forthcoming Issues</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S1042-3680(12)00025-3</dc:identifier><dc:source>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 23, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-04-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>23</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1042-3680(11)X0006-2</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>xi</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>xi</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000174/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Preface</title><link>http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000174/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Malignant glioblastoma is the most common and lethal primary brain tumor, and arguably the most challenging disease entity encountered in the fields of neuro-oncology and neurosurgery. Currently, average survival of a patient with malignant glioma remains approximately just over one year. Malignant glioma is a grave diagnosis for patients, their families, their treating clinicians. The devastating nature of its diagnosis has come to public attention after Senator Kennedy’s recent struggle with the disease.</description><dc:title>Preface</dc:title><dc:creator>Isaac Yang, Seunggu J. Han</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nec.2012.02.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 23, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-27</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-27</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>23</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1042-3680(11)X0006-2</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>xiii</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>xiii</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000186/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Note to Readers</title><link>http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000186/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Authors John D. Rolston, MD, PhD, Sharanya Arcot Desai, BE, MSc, Nealen G. Laxpati, BS, and Robert E. Gross, MD, PhD would like to acknowledge the support of Steve M. Potter, PhD during the preparation of their article, “Electrical Stimulation for Epilepsy: Experimental Approaches,” which appeared in the October 2011 issue of Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, Epilepsy Surgery: The Emerging Field of Neuromodulation.</description><dc:title>Note to Readers</dc:title><dc:creator>John D. Rolston</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nec.2012.02.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 23, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-04-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>23</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1042-3680(11)X0006-2</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>xv</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>xv</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000113/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Current Surgical Management of Insular Gliomas</title><link>http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000113/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>The insula is a functionally and anatomically complex cortical structure that can be affected by both low-grade and high-grade gliomas. This complexity often prevents many neurosurgeons from attempting to surgically manage insular gliomas. This article reviews the anatomic and functional uniqueness of the insula and the surgical outcomes and lessons learned from previously reported surgical series. Successful management of insular gliomas, defined as maximal resection of the tumor without postoperative neurologic morbidity, can be achieved through a sophisticated understanding of the neurovascular structure of the insular region and an intraoperative functional mapping using cortico-subcortical electrical stimulation.</description><dc:title>Current Surgical Management of Insular Gliomas</dc:title><dc:creator>Young-Hoon Kim, Chae-Yong Kim</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nec.2012.01.010</dc:identifier><dc:source>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 23, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-23</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-23</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>23</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1042-3680(11)X0006-2</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>199</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>206</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000162/abstract?rss=yes"><title>The Rise and Fall of “Biopsy and Radiate”: A History of Surgical Nihilism in Glioma Treatment</title><link>http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000162/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Many neurosurgeons take a nihilistic approach to surgical treatment of gliomas, stating the inability to achieve a cure. Where this idea comes from is somewhat nebulous to most neurosurgeons. A review of the scientific studies supporting the commonly held beliefs about gliomas shows that these ideas regarding the surgical treatment of gliomas are based on overgeneralizations of data from older studies. One should avoid the temptation to apply them to the greater concept of what gliomas are, how they behave, and what should be done, but rather we should continue to scientifically evaluate the role of surgical resection in glioma treatment.</description><dc:title>The Rise and Fall of “Biopsy and Radiate”: A History of Surgical Nihilism in Glioma Treatment</dc:title><dc:creator>Seunggu J. Han, Michael E. Sughrue</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nec.2012.02.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 23, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-04-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>23</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1042-3680(11)X0006-2</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>207</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>214</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000149/abstract?rss=yes"><title>The Use of Motor Mapping to Aid Resection of Eloquent Gliomas</title><link>http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000149/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Surgery remains one of the oldest and still most important forms of treatment for patients with glioma. The advantages of surgical resection for glioma must be balanced with the potential of operative morbidity to surrounding eloquent brain. To that end, advances in functional brain mapping allow for safer operations with more aggressive surgical resections. A brief history of motor mapping as well as its present day use in aiding resection of eloquent gliomas is discussed.</description><dc:title>The Use of Motor Mapping to Aid Resection of Eloquent Gliomas</dc:title><dc:creator>Bryan D. Choi, Ankit I. Mehta, Kristen A. Batich, Allan H. Friedman, John H. Sampson</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nec.2012.01.013</dc:identifier><dc:source>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 23, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>23</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1042-3680(11)X0006-2</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>215</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>225</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000101/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Characteristics and Treatment of Seizures in Patients with High-Grade Glioma: A Review</title><link>http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000101/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>High-grade gliomas (HGGs), including anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma multiforme, are the most common primary brain tumors, and are often associated with seizures. Seizure control is a critical but often underappreciated goal in the treatment of patients harboring these malignant lesions. Patients with HGG who also have medically intractable seizures should be considered for a palliative resection guided by electrocorticography and functional mapping. Antiepileptic drugs remain the mainstay of seizure treatment in HGG, and antiepileptic medication should be started after a tumor-related seizure, but should not be used prophylactically in the absence of seizure activity.</description><dc:title>Characteristics and Treatment of Seizures in Patients with High-Grade Glioma: A Review</dc:title><dc:creator>Dario J. Englot, Mitchel S. Berger, Edward F. Chang, Paul A. Garcia</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nec.2012.01.009</dc:identifier><dc:source>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 23, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-04-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>23</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1042-3680(11)X0006-2</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>227</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>235</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000125/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Pathology: Commonly Monitored Glioblastoma Markers: EFGR, EGFRvIII, PTEN, and MGMT</title><link>http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000125/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>The purpose of this article is to update the neurosurgical field on current molecular markers important to glioblastoma biology, treatment, and prognosis. The highlighted biologic markers in this article include epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), EGFR variant III (EGFRvIII), phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN), and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT).</description><dc:title>Pathology: Commonly Monitored Glioblastoma Markers: EFGR, EGFRvIII, PTEN, and MGMT</dc:title><dc:creator>Joaquin Q. Camara-Quintana, Ryan T. Nitta, Gordon Li</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nec.2012.01.011</dc:identifier><dc:source>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 23, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-24</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-24</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>23</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1042-3680(11)X0006-2</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>237</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>246</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000022/abstract?rss=yes"><title>The Role of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in the Management of High-Grade Gliomas</title><link>http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000022/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>The purpose of this article is to update the neurosurgical community on the role of adjuvant radiation therapy in the management of patients with high-grade glioma. This information guides clinicians in the multidisciplinary management of these patients via a review of the literature describing current treatment paradigms as well as new avenues of investigation.</description><dc:title>The Role of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in the Management of High-Grade Gliomas</dc:title><dc:creator>Joshua J. Wind, Richard Young, Ashima Saini, Jonathan H. Sherman</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nec.2012.01.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 23, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-16</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-16</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>23</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1042-3680(11)X0006-2</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>247</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>258</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000046/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Radiation Options for High-Grade Gliomas</title><link>http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000046/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Radiotherapy has become a part of the standard treatment of high-grade gliomas. Studies have shown that high-dose radiation results in more effective tumor control but at the cost of radionecrosis and other radiation-related side effects. Despite advancing techniques in stereotaxy and precise radiotherapy delivery techniques, studies published for stereotactic radiosurgical treatment of high-grade gliomas have not been unanimous, with large trials showing no survival benefit compared with conventional conformal radiotherapy. New imaging modalities have been studied with the hope to improve accuracy in the planning of radiosurgical treatments. However, further large scale studies are needed to confirm these results.</description><dc:title>Radiation Options for High-Grade Gliomas</dc:title><dc:creator>Benedict Beng Teck Taw, Alessandra A. Gorgulho, Michael T. Selch, Antonio A.F. De Salles</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nec.2012.01.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 23, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>23</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1042-3680(11)X0006-2</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>259</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>267</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000071/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Radiology: Criteria for Determining Response to Treatment and Recurrence of High-Grade Gliomas</title><link>http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000071/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>The development of radiologic criteria for the assessment of response to treatment in high-grade gliomas (HGGs) has evolved considerably over the past few decades since the original response criteria based on computed tomography imaging. Accuracy and objectivity in the assessment of response to treatment of HGGs is necessary for altering treatment regimens, establishing accurate provider communication, and improving the quality of clinical trials. Future studies assessing emerging advanced neuroimaging techniques will facilitate the development of even more accurate evidence-based radiologic response criteria.</description><dc:title>Radiology: Criteria for Determining Response to Treatment and Recurrence of High-Grade Gliomas</dc:title><dc:creator>Joshua Lucas, Gabriel Zada</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nec.2012.01.006</dc:identifier><dc:source>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 23, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-20</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-20</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>23</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1042-3680(11)X0006-2</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>269</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>276</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000034/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Pseudoprogression and Treatment Effect</title><link>http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000034/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>The standard of care for newly diagnosed malignant glioblastoma entails postoperative radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide. There has been an increase in the incidence of enhancing and progressive lesions seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) following treatment. Conventional MRI with gadolinium contrast is unable to distinguish between the effects of treatment and actual tumor recurrence. New modalities have provided additional information for distinguishing treatment effects from tumor progression but are not 100% sensitive or specific in diagnosing progression. Novel radiographic or nonradiographic biomarkers with sensitivity and specificity verified in large randomized clinical trials are needed to detect progression.</description><dc:title>Pseudoprogression and Treatment Effect</dc:title><dc:creator>Arman Jahangiri, Manish K. Aghi</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nec.2012.01.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 23, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-16</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-16</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>23</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1042-3680(11)X0006-2</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>277</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>287</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000058/abstract?rss=yes"><title>The Role of BCNU Polymer Wafers (Gliadel) in the Treatment of Malignant Glioma</title><link>http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000058/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>The 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU; carmustine) polymer wafer (Gliadel) was developed for use in malignant glioma to deliver higher doses of chemotherapy directly to tumor tissue while bypassing systemic side effects. Phase III clinical trials for patients with newly diagnosed malignant gliomas demonstrated a small, but statistically significant, improvement in survival. However, the rate of complications, including an increase in cerebrospinal fluid leaks and intracranial hypertension, has limited their use. This article reviews the current data for use of BCNU wafers in malignant gliomas.</description><dc:title>The Role of BCNU Polymer Wafers (Gliadel) in the Treatment of Malignant Glioma</dc:title><dc:creator>Seema Nagpal</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nec.2012.01.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 23, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-20</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-20</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>23</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1042-3680(11)X0006-2</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>289</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>295</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS104236801200006X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Alternative Chemotherapeutic Agents: Nitrosoureas, Cisplatin, Irinotecan</title><link>http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS104236801200006X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Irinotecan, cisplatin, and nitrosoureas have a long history of use in brain tumors, with demonstrated efficacy in the adjuvant treatment of malignant gliomas. In the era of temozolomide with concurrent radiotherapy given as the standard of care, their use has shifted to treatment at progression or recurrence. Now with the widespread use of bevacizumab in the recurrent setting, irinotecan and other chemotherapies are seeing increased use in combination with bevacizumab and alone in the recurrent setting. The activity of these chemotherapeutic agents in brain tumors will likely ensure a place in the armamentarium of neuro-oncologists for many years.</description><dc:title>Alternative Chemotherapeutic Agents: Nitrosoureas, Cisplatin, Irinotecan</dc:title><dc:creator>Jose A. Carrillo, Claudia A. Munoz</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nec.2012.01.005</dc:identifier><dc:source>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 23, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-20</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-20</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>23</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1042-3680(11)X0006-2</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>297</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>306</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000083/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Temozolomide and Other Potential Agents for the Treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme</title><link>http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000083/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>This article provides historical and recent perspectives related to the use of temozolomide for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. Temozolomide has quickly become part of the standard of care for the modern treatment of stage IV glioblastoma multiforme since its approval in 2005. Yet despite its improvements from previous therapies, median survival remains approximately 15 months, with a 2-year survival rate of 8% to 26%. The mechanism of action of this chemotherapeutic agent, conferred advantages and limitations, treatment resistance and rescue, and potential targets of future research are discussed.</description><dc:title>Temozolomide and Other Potential Agents for the Treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme</dc:title><dc:creator>Daniel T. Nagasawa, Frances Chow, Andrew Yew, Won Kim, Nicole Cremer, Isaac Yang</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nec.2012.01.007</dc:identifier><dc:source>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 23, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-04-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>23</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1042-3680(11)X0006-2</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>307</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>322</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000095/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Superselective Intra-Arterial Cerebral Infusion of Novel Agents After Blood–Brain Disruption for the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme: A Technical Case Series</title><link>http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000095/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Glioblastoma multiforme constitutes the most common primary brain tumor and carries a grim prognosis for patients treated with conventional therapy including surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. There has been a recent revival of selective intra-arterial delivery of targeted agents for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. Because these agents are less toxic and their delivery leads to a higher tumor–drug concentration, this combination may provide a better outcome in patients with high-grade glioma. This article discusses early experiences in patients who received superselective intra-arterial cerebral infusion of bevacizumab, cetuximab, and temozolamide after blood–brain barrier disruption with mannitol.</description><dc:title>Superselective Intra-Arterial Cerebral Infusion of Novel Agents After Blood–Brain Disruption for the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme: A Technical Case Series</dc:title><dc:creator>Benjamin J. Shin, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Howard A. Riina, John A. Boockvar</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nec.2012.01.008</dc:identifier><dc:source>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 23, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-20</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-20</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>23</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1042-3680(11)X0006-2</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>323</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>329</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000150/abstract?rss=yes"><title>The Role of Avastin in the Management of Recurrent Glioblastoma</title><link>http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000150/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Glioblastoma multiforme is a malignant primary brain tumor for which no cure has been developed. However, with aggressive surgical resection, radiation, and the advent of temozolomide, the overall survival of patients with glioblastomas has improved significantly. Despite this multimodal treatment, glioblastoma invariably recurs. Although treatment options for glioblastoma recurrence are limited, one promising therapy is bevacizumab (Avastin). The role of Avastin in the management of recurrent glioblastomas is reviewed.</description><dc:title>The Role of Avastin in the Management of Recurrent Glioblastoma</dc:title><dc:creator>Jennifer A. Sweet, Michelle L. Feinberg, Jonathan H. Sherman</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nec.2012.02.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 23, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-27</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-27</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>23</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1042-3680(11)X0006-2</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>331</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>341</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000137/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Management of Multifocal and Multicentric Gliomas</title><link>http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000137/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>The diffuse nature of gliomas has long confounded attempts at achieving a definitive cure. The advent of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging made it increasingly apparent that gliomas could have a multifocal or multicentric appearance. Treating these tumors is the summit of an already daunting challenge, because the obstacles that must be surmounted to treat gliomas in general, namely, their heterogeneity, diffuse nature, and ability to insidiously invade normal brain, are more conspicuous in this subset of tumors.</description><dc:title>Management of Multifocal and Multicentric Gliomas</dc:title><dc:creator>Chirag G. Patil, Paula Eboli, Jethro Hu</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nec.2012.01.012</dc:identifier><dc:source>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 23, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-04-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>23</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1042-3680(11)X0006-2</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>343</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>350</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000265/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Index</title><link>http://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/PIIS1042368012000265/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>Index</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S1042-3680(12)00026-5</dc:identifier><dc:source>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 23, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-04-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Neurosurgery Clinics of North America</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>23</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1042-3680(11)X0006-2</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>351</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>355</prism:endingPage></item></rdf:RDF>
